ICJR REWIND: Exploring a New Alignment Paradigm in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Durability of the implanted prosthesis has been the goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) since the earliest days of the procedure.
And, it’s been achieved: At the ICJR East ISK Hip & Knee Course, Mark W. Pagnano, MD, from Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, reported that combined registry data show about a 1.25% risk of TKA revision per year – which means the vast majority of TKA patients will receive a knee that will last them 10 to 30 years.
Orthopaedic surgeons are now turning their attention to improving function of the knee, hoping to close the “satisfaction gap” between total hip and total knee patients. Some surgeons are looking at solving alignment issues with computer navigation and/or robotics, other are considering whether advanced sensor-tensor devices can help with ligament balancing, and still others are investigating new implants to preserve the anterior cruciate ligament.
Dr. Pagnano has a different approach to the surgical technique for TKA: He views the 3-dimensional position of the femoral component in space as the prime driver of total knee function, no matter which implant design is used.
The problem, he said, is that orthopaedic surgeons systematically get this wrong in most cases – sometimes the knee is just a little off the normal anatomy, but other times it’s off by a lot – because the tibia has traditionally driven the surgical technique. Surgeons have been taught to make bone cuts by what he calls a “substantially generic cookbook,” despite the variability in native knee anatomy. For 3 decades, surgeons have followed 2 “laws” for the tibial cut:
- Cut the tibia at 90° (0° varus or valgus)
- Minimize the thickness of the bone that’s been cut
This approach results in unintended consequences on the femoral side that can explain at least some of the issues with knee function in TKA, Dr. Pagnano said.
For example, a tibia cut in 0° changes the joint surface in most knees, resulting in a relative over-resection laterally in extension and flexion. The surgeon must then make changes on the femoral side, either under-resecting laterally in extension or doing a medial ligament release to balance the flexion gap. This adds 3° of external rotation in flexion.
Is it time to explore a new alignment paradigm that could improve function in TKA patients? Click on the image above to hear Dr. Pagnano’s answer to that question and learn more about his approach to the femur and tibia cuts.
This article was originally published on January 17, 2019.
Disclosures: Dr. Pagnano has disclosed that he has product development agreements with DePuy Synthes and Stryker.